patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Surveys Liven Up OU Presidential Debate Watch Party

Moss Cairns clickers allow participants to weigh in on how candidates performed during Wednesday night's event.

 

If those who attended a watch party at the Oakland University Oakland Center are any indication, Mitt Romney is going to win the Republican primary.

In a survey taken at the close of Wednesday night's "Your Money, Your Vote: The Republican Presidential Debate" at OU in Rochester, 82 percent of about 250 audience members said they expected Romney to get the Republican nod. And virtually everyone – 90 percent – thought the debate was a good thing for Oakland University.

The results were collected through hand-held audience participation devices provided by Minneapolis-based Moss Cairns. Company principal Steve Moss said the firm has worked with Oakland University on other initiatives and was hired to make the watch party "a more enjoyable experience."

Students who participated agreed the "clickers" made the evening a lot more fun.

For Katie Hepfinger of Brighton, "It was cool just seeing what other people thought. I was more conscious of what was being said." While she describes herself as "more of a liberal," Hepfinger said she attended the party because she wants to understand the issues.

Luke Phillips of Grand Blanc appreciated the more "participatory" feeling the technology added to the debate. "It gave us an opportunity to voice our opinions in a macro setting," he said. "And it helped curb the malaise."

While people moved in and out of the room during the event, Moss said the company has a way to track which keypad was used when, and that's on a spreadsheet included with all the data the university will receive. He said the university owns the data; the company can't release it without permission.

Survey results displayed during the watch party showed more than 40 percent of students moved on their support for candidates after the debate, with Romney and Newt Gingrich gaining ground. Drilling down, the data showed percentage of change in support was very similar among Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and Independents.

Amanda Grzadziel attended the debate viewing party wearing an Obama T-shirt and bringing an open mind to hear from the Republican candidates.

The 23-year-old Royal Oak resident voted for Obama in 2008, and still supports the president, but said she is an "open-minded" person. While the Oakland University junior did not get heckled or harassed for being a Democrat at a Republican event, she did gain an interest in Mitt Romney and Herman Cain with his "999" flat tax plan.

"I think (Romney) looked the most presidential," Grzadziel said.

On the other side of the spectrum, Livonia resident and chair of the University of Michigan-Dearborn College Republicans Alexander Stuart felt Gingrich was the clear winner.

"The person I'm supporting didn't change," said Stuart, who is a communications major with a political science minor, "but I think debate-wise, Newt Gingrich came out on top. He had some of the best sound bites."

John Huntsman and Rick Santorum, on the other hand, lost ground in Stuart's opinion.

"Huntsman especially. I think he did the worst ... He got no applause," Stuart said.

> Complete coverage of the GOP debate at Oakland University  

Related Topics: Debate OU, Election, Republican, election 2012, oakland university, and participate 2012

Mike Reno

10:44 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011

OU really did a poor job of coordinating this. " 82 percent of about 250 audience members said..." There was supposed to be 400 seats.

Reply

a concerned dad

11:52 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011

There were 400 seats. You obviously weren't there but feel capable of speaking on it anyway. You embarrass yourself. Again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Reno

12:16 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

Did you read the article, and the reference to the 250 seats? Why criticize me, rather than the reporting? Unless, of course, it's personal.

a concerned dad

12:31 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

Ok, I'll spell it out: did you see the "milling around part?" Not all in attendance voted, during the 10-second window allotted for each question. No problem with the reporting.

Reply

Kristin Bull

12:34 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

Sorry for the confusion on this: there were 250 in the audience with the "clickers." Not everyone there had one, though.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joni Hubred-Golden

1:21 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

I can tell you there were exactly 400 seats, because I counted them as I was estimating attendance for the event for another article. It was difficult to estimate attendance, because people were moving in and out, but my rough count was right around 325 at one point.

Reply

Leave a comment